Publications

References to scientific publications citing Dragonfly…

DRAGONFLY 30-DAY TRIAL

Resources / Publications

Strain ultrasound elastography of aneurysm sac content after randomized endoleak embolization with sclerosing and non-sclerosing chitosan-based hydrogels in a preclinical model

Lojan Sivakumaran - Sciences biomédicales, Faculté de médecine, Université de Montréal

Papyrus : Institutional Repository, 2021.


Keywords

Élastographie; Anévrisme; Endovasculaire; Aorte; Embolisation; Endofuite; Chitosane; STS; Elastography; Abdominal aortic aneurysm; EVAR; Embolization; Endoleak; Chitosan; Health Sciences; Radiology


Abstract

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is the modality of choice for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). EVAR is limited by the development of endoleaks, which necessitate long-term imaging follow-up. Conventional follow-up modalities suffer from unique limitations. Strain ultrasound elastography (SUE) has been recently proposed as an imaging adjunct to detect endoleaks and to characterize aneurysm mechanical properties. Once detected, certain endoleaks may be treated with embolization; however, success is limited. In this context, the embolic agent CH-STS—containing a chitosan hydrogel and the sclerosant sodium tetradecyl sulphate (STS)—was created. CH-STS demonstrates favorable mechanical properties in vitro; however, its behavior in vivo and impact on sac evolution compared to a non-sclerosing chitosan-based embolic agent (CH) merit further characterization. Purpose: To compare the mechanical properties of the constituents of endoleaks embolized with CH and CH-STS—including the agent, the intraluminal thrombus (ILT), and the overall sac—via SUE. Methods: Bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms with type I endoleaks were created in nine dogs. In each animal, one endoleak was randomly embolized with CH, and the other with CH-STS. Duplex ultrasound (DUS) and radiofrequency cine loops were acquired at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and—in 3 subjects—6 months post-embolization. Contrast-enhanced CT was performed at 3 months and—where applicable—6 months post-embolization. Histopathological analysis was performed at time of sacrifice. Radiological studies and histopathological slides were co-registered to identify three regions of interest (ROIs) on the cine loops: embolic agent (at sacrifice), ILT (at sacrifice), and aneurysm sac (at all follow-up times). SUE was performed using segmentations from two independent observers on the cine loops. Maximum axial deformation (MAD) was the main outcome. Statistical analysis was performed using general linear mixed models and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results: Residual endoleaks were identified in 7/9 (77.8%) and 4/9 (44.4%) aneurysms embolized with CH and CH-STS, respectively. CH-STS had a 66 % lower MAD (p < 0.001) than CH. The ILT had a 37% lower MAD (p = 0.010) than CH and a 77% greater MAD (p = 0.079; trending towards significance) than CH-STS. There was no difference in the ILT between treatment groups. Aneurysm sacs embolized with CH-STS had a 29% lower MAD (p < 0.001) than those with CH. Residual endoleak increased MAD of the aneurysm sac by 53% (p < 0.001), regardless of the agent used. The ICC for MAD was 0.807 between readers’ segmentations. Conclusion: CH-STS confers lower strain values to embolized aneurysms. Persistent endoleaks result are associated with increased sac strain, which may be useful for clinical follow-up.


How Our Software Was Used

Dragonfly was used to display raw RF acquisitions obtained of the proximal, middle, and distal sac of each aneurysm at each time as point B-mode cines.


Return to Publications list.

Have a Publication to Share?

We'd be pleased to add your paper to our publications list.